Five grants a week, chosen for what is strange about them.
Most funding newsletters rank by award size, so everyone reads the same five listings and applies to the same programs. Funding Friday ranks for structural oddity instead — the requirement, the carve-out or the unusual role that changes who should actually apply. Plus the two newest pieces from the OpenGrants blog, summarized by what they claim rather than teased.
New issue every Friday·9:00 AM Pacific·Free
Get the next issue
Email address is all that is required.
Check your email.
We sent you a confirmation link. Click it and you are on the list — nothing arrives until you do. If it is not in your inbox in a couple of minutes, check spam.
The two newest posts from the blog. Each one gets a dated topic kicker, the headline, and a two-sentence summary that states the claim the piece actually makes — so you can tell from the email whether it is worth your click.
02
Five worth a look
Five open grants. Each carries the funder and geography, a fixed data strip, and one sentence on why it earned the slot. The strip is always the same three fields in the same order, so you can scan five programs without re-learning the layout each time.
Anatomy of a pick
Where each field comes from — not a sample listing.
Funder · Geography
Program name
DeadlineRead off the source record
AwardOr “See listing” if unverifiable
WhoEligibility, as written
Why it is hereOne sentence on the structural quirk that earned the slot.
Selection
How the five get picked
01
Ranked for what is odd about them
A co-funding requirement. A pass-through lending role where you do not build anything and instead run a loan fund. An eligibility carve-out that disqualifies the obvious applicants. Programs get picked for the structural feature that changes who should apply — not for the size of the pot.
02
Range is enforced, not hoped for
Every issue clears a diversity gate before it can send. You will not open one and find five listings from the same agency, because that outcome is not reachable.
Five different funders
At least three categories
Never all-federal
Never more than two from one state
03
Every figure comes from the source record
Deadlines, award ceilings and eligibility are read off the listing, not summarized from memory. Anything that cannot be verified prints "See listing" instead of a number. If an issue cannot clear its gates, it blocks rather than sends.
We would rather skip a week than print a wrong deadline.
Written for both sides of the table
If you are seeking funding
You get five programs you were unlikely to surface yourself, with the deadline and the eligibility line already pulled, and a reason each one is unusual enough to be worth twenty minutes. Nonprofits, startups, small businesses and the grant writers working for them all read the same issue.
If you are deploying it
Each pick is framed to show what it funds and what it signals — which structures are being tried, where the carve-outs are landing, and how money is moving across categories and geographies week over week.
Questions
How often does it send?
Every Friday at 9:00 AM Pacific. One email, two fixed sections, no separate promotional sends.
What does it cost?
Nothing. It is free, and it does not require an OpenGrants account.
Is this for grant seekers or funders?
Both, deliberately. Each pick is framed so a seeker learns what it funds and a funder learns what it signals about where money is moving. Within grant seekers there is no segmentation — nonprofits, startups, small businesses and the grant writers working for them all get the same issue.
Can I read past issues?
Not yet — the first issue has not sent. Back issues are on the roadmap and are not published at the moment.
How do I unsubscribe?
One click, from a link in every issue. We store your email address and, if you give it, your first name — nothing else.
Start with Friday.
Email address, one click to leave, no other mail from us.